<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truncated RSS feeds do not make sense for Adsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timyang.com/2005/08/truncated-rss-feeds-do-not-make-sense-for-adsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timyang.com/2005/08/truncated-rss-feeds-do-not-make-sense-for-adsense/</link>
	<description>Nothing to see here.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://timyang.com/2005/08/truncated-rss-feeds-do-not-make-sense-for-adsense/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timyang.com/2005/07/truncated-rss-feeds-do-not-make-sense-for-adsense/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I get a lot of traffic via Feedster and other blogosphere search engines. Many of these only index the content in the feed, therefor the more content within, the more likely you'll generate a click-thru from a first time visitor. Just another supporting reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a lot of traffic via Feedster and other blogosphere search engines. Many of these only index the content in the feed, therefor the more content within, the more likely you&#8217;ll generate a click-thru from a first time visitor. Just another supporting reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
